The Universal Law Formulation Of The Categorical Imperative Essay

The ordinary Law Formulation Of The Categorical Imperative - Essay ExampleAct in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, neer merely as a kernel to an end, but always at the same time as an end.This formulation deals with the devoid impart of entirely persons, which arises from rational typifyion. Thus, if a persons free will is not rational, then there is no freedom, as freedom is not entirely autonomous. A persons actions affect others who are around him, and if a persons free will interferes with the freedom of another person, then that action is not morally acceptable. A master may behave a right to his slave. He has the right to own the services of his slave, but if the slave owner feels that he also owns the slave and that the slave is his own property, then he has devalued the slave to a center to an end and not an end in itself. This is morally wrong as it devalues humanity of the other person, in this case, the s lave. A person has primarily the perfect duty to preserve humanity by using it in a manner that is a not a means to an end to themselves or to others. Then, with the imperfect duty, unmatched should always strive to improve their humanity or others humanity for the good of all and as long as it does not inhibit the perfect duty.Third, Kant suggests that all rational beings must act as legislative members through their maxim, in the universal kingdom of ends. This formulation when broken down means that a person should treat himself and others both as a means and an end, but mostly as an end in itself.